There’s a quiet tension that lives inside many high achievers—a sense that no matter how much they accomplish, they’re one mistake away from being “found out.” That feeling, better known as imposter syndrome, often hides beneath polished résumés and glowing evaluations. A new study adds nuance to this familiar story, showing that imposter syndrome and perfectionism are tightly linked—but only certain kinds of perfectionism. The findings suggest that self-doubt doesn’t come from arrogance or ego; it comes from the quieter, harsher corners of self-expectation.
What exactly connects imposter syndrome and perfectionism?
Researchers have long suspected a relationship between the two, but the latest evidence paints a more precise picture. It’s not perfectionism in general—it’s the rigid, self-critical variety that correlates most strongly with imposter feelings. People who hold themselves to impossible internal standards, who equate mistakes with personal failure, are far more likely to feel like frauds despite their competence.
By contrast, “narcissistic perfectionism”—a perfectionism directed outward, where someone expects flawlessness from others—doesn’t share that same connection. This distinction matters. It suggests that imposter syndrome isn’t about wanting to appear perfect to the world; it’s about fearing you’ll never meet your own standards.
Why doesn’t narcissistic perfectionism trigger imposter feelings?
At first glance, one might assume that people who demand perfection from others would also feel pressure to embody it themselves. Yet the data show a separation. Narcissistic perfectionists may project confidence because their sense of worth depends on maintaining superiority, not on internal validation. Their self-view is defended rather than doubted.
In contrast, those with self-critical perfectionism constantly monitor themselves for flaws. Every success is provisional, every compliment suspect. When a project goes well, they might think, “That was luck.” When it doesn’t, they see confirmation of their deepest fear: that they don’t belong. As one psychologist put it, the imposter’s perfectionism “turns inward like a blade.”
How does this play out in real life?
Consider a young engineer named Lila, recently promoted to lead a project team. She spends nights revising minor details in her code, terrified that an overlooked bug will expose her as unqualified. Even after praise from her manager, she feels relief rather than pride. I’ve met people like her in creative and technical fields alike—brilliant, diligent, and quietly convinced they’re one misstep away from collapse.
That tension is exhausting. Over time, it can erode motivation, feed burnout, and even stunt growth. When every success feels undeserved, risk-taking becomes dangerous. Why reach higher if the fall might prove your worst suspicion true?
What does the research actually show?
The study that sparked this discussion, shared recently on Reddit’s r/science community, analyzed different dimensions of perfectionism and their relationship to imposter feelings. Rigid self-critical perfectionism—defined by unrelenting personal standards and harsh self-assessment—showed a strong positive correlation. Meanwhile, narcissistic perfectionism showed no connection at all.
This suggests that imposter syndrome thrives in environments where people internalize perfection as a moral duty. Academic and professional cultures that reward flawless performance can quietly reinforce it. The irony, of course, is that those who feel like imposters often hold themselves to standards far higher than anyone else would demand.
It’s worth noting that correlation doesn’t confirm cause. We can’t say whether perfectionism breeds imposter feelings or whether the reverse happens—that chronic self-doubt drives people to chase perfection as a shield. Most likely, it’s a feedback loop, each reinforcing the other until the distinction blurs.
Can understanding the link help people recover?
Recognizing the pattern is a start. When I’ve spoken with colleagues about imposter syndrome, a common theme emerges: they know their fear isn’t rational, but logic doesn’t quiet it. What helps more is reframing perfectionism itself—not as a badge of diligence but as a barrier to learning.
Psychologists often recommend small, deliberate experiments in self-compassion. For example:
- Set “good enough” goals for a week and observe the results.
- Write down compliments or positive feedback without immediately discounting them.
- Treat mistakes as data, not verdicts.
These practices sound simple, but they chip away at the rigid thinking that underpins self-critical perfectionism. Over time, they can help separate one’s identity from one’s achievements—a subtle but powerful shift.
Is perfectionism always harmful?
Not entirely. Some forms of perfectionism drive healthy ambition and careful work. The difference lies in flexibility. Adaptive perfectionists can set high standards while accepting imperfection as part of progress. Maladaptive perfectionists, by contrast, tie their self-worth to outcomes, leaving no room for error or humanity.
I’ve noticed that people who learn to see perfectionism as a spectrum—rather than a personality—make faster strides toward balance. They begin to recognize that precision and self-kindness can coexist. The scientist who double-checks her data doesn’t have to berate herself for minor inconsistencies. The writer who edits a paragraph ten times can still celebrate finishing the draft.
What does this mean for workplaces and schools?
Organizations that value excellence often unwittingly reward the very patterns that foster imposter syndrome. Constant comparison, public ranking, and zero-tolerance cultures send a clear message: only flawless performance earns belonging. Changing that narrative requires leadership willing to model imperfection—sharing mistakes, normalizing feedback, and praising process as much as outcome.
Some companies have started doing just that. Mentorship programs pairing seasoned professionals with newer employees can help demystify success. When a respected mentor admits to early insecurities or past failures, it reframes competence as a journey rather than a fixed state.
Where does the research go from here?
Future studies may explore how early experiences shape the perfectionism–imposter link. Family expectations, cultural norms, and educational environments could all play roles. There’s also interest in how gender and race intersect with these dynamics, given that underrepresented groups often face additional scrutiny and internalized pressure to prove themselves.
What remains clear is that imposter syndrome isn’t a sign of weakness or false modesty. It’s a learned response to environments—and internal narratives—that equate worth with flawlessness. Understanding that connection doesn’t erase the feeling overnight, but it offers a map out of the maze.
In closing: self-expectation, reimagined
The new research reframes imposter syndrome not as a mysterious quirk of confidence but as a byproduct of rigid self-criticism. When perfectionism turns inward, it fuels the cycle of doubt that so many professionals quietly endure. But by recognizing that the harsh inner critic isn’t the voice of truth—just a habit of thought—people can begin to unlearn it.
Perfectionism, after all, isn’t the enemy of success. It’s the enemy of peace. And peace, in the long run, tends to make us better at what we do.
Leave a Reply